🔗 Share this article

Tehran is willing to reinitiate nuclear talks with the United States provided that it is treated with "dignity" and "respect", Tehran's foreign minister has announced.

Abbas Araghchi stated solely negotiations was effective, and disclosed new appeals had originated from intermediaries to reopen negotiations with the American leadership. He said Iran did not have unreported enrichment locations, and Tehran had not yet reached a point to permit the global atomic watchdog to access bombed nuclear sites for protective measures.

Navigating a Complex Course

Araghchi is treading a complex route since Iran aims to avoid be seen to be acting from a situation of disadvantage, and he consistently maintained that Iran had arisen more powerful defensively and psychologically from the joint assault on its nuclear sites in June.

He was addressing at a security conference in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to refine atomic fuel on home soil that it will never give up" – the key factor of the deadlock in the earlier negotiations.

Earlier Discussions Suddenly Ended

The previous five rounds of discussions between the US and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and acrimonious termination on 12 June when Israel, with Washington's assistance, struck Iran's enrichment centers in a two-week conflict that culminated with the US president claiming the facilities had been eliminated. Following this, Western states exercised their authority to reinstate global restrictions, but Iran maintains they have not had a substantial consequence.

Perfect Agreement Suggested

Tehran representatives stated they felt they had reached a "ideal resolution" to the uranium processing matter in previous talks, when it was decided an domestic cooperative with American involvement could enrich uranium. Both sides would have been able to claim victory since domestic enrichment would have persisted and the US could be confident that Iran's enrichment initiative was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been agreed in the talks that Washington's technical specialists could function within Iranian territory, but that was a reasonable assumption of the consortium proposal. Officials asserted on multiple occasions they had secured an understanding with Trump's special envoy the US official only for the agreement to fall apart due to "opponents in the US".

Current Position

Iran's diplomats declared the partnership proposal was now withdrawn, but it seems highly likely the offer could be resurrected in certain ways if talks resume.

Trump in recent days stated he had been receiving messages that Iran wanted to resume discussions, but confidentially Iran's diplomats state they are not yet receiving consistent overtures from America either directly or from key regional mediators, such as the Qatari government, Egypt, Oman and Saudi Arabia. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been accused of non-responsiveness in the wake of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Tehran asserts diplomacy is not part of a performance.

Negotiating Position

In his address to the gathering, designed to depict the US as a controlling nation that exploits the idea of worldwide standards, the foreign minister said the fortnight-long engagement showed the conflict could not be resolved by military means. He said the assaults started with a US demand for an total Iran submission and ended with an absolute demand for a truce.

Iran is assured the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were executed with total Washington understanding and cooperation, making confidence challenging to reestablish.

Negotiations Stays the Primary Answer

Araghchi said: "It was not Iran that had abandoned diplomacy; it was America and the Western nations that had always attempted to enforce their demands during the talks. Dialogue can still be active and remains the final answer to settle conflicts, but its standards, regulations and tenets must be adhered to."

"Provided that they address to the Iranian people with the tone of dignity and respect, they will receive a answer in the identical language."

Recovery and Reconstruction

In what is described by Tehran representatives as the battle of repair and reconstruction, the foreign minister stated he was certain Iran's defence capabilities "are much stronger than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been rebuilt. We gained multiple understandings from this engagement; we have discovered our personal limitations and the vulnerabilities of the adversary."

He continued: "We successfully passed this war. Our enrichment knowledge, which they planned to eliminate, remains in place. The facilities and gear, if damaged, will be rebuilt; what is crucial is the will of the nation of Iran and then the social solidarity that they aimed at, but were unable to shatter. The nation of Iran have developed more resilient, more cohesive, and more backing of the government and the country in the aftermath of this attack."